Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats: Jake Moody’s Walk-Off Kick Leads Chicago to Victory
Three turnovers can sink a team with 47 more seconds on the clock, and that’s exactly what happened to Washington on a rainy Monday night. Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders match player stats from Week 6 tell a story of a Bears defense that forced the fatal mistake and an offense patient enough to cash it in. Here’s the full breakdown of every stat line that decided this one.
1. Title & Intro
The Lead
Jake Moody drilled a 38-yard field goal as time expired at Northwest Stadium, giving the Chicago Bears a 25-24 win over the Washington Commanders on October 13, 2025, in front of 64,457 fans on Monday Night Football. The rookie kicker — signed off the practice squad days earlier after Cairo Santos went down with a quadriceps injury — connected on his fourth attempt of the night to cap a nine-play, 36-yard closing drive that Chicago only got the chance to run because of a Washington turnover with just over three minutes remaining.
The Bears trailed for most of the second half before Caleb Williams found D’Andre Swift for a 55-yard touchdown early in the fourth quarter to cut the deficit to two. Washington still led 24-22 and appeared ready to run out the clock, but a botched exchange between Jayden Daniels and rookie running back Jacory Croskey-Merritt produced a fumble that Chicago recovered, setting up Moody’s game-winner. It was Washington’s third turnover of the night — matching its total from the first five games of the season combined — and it turned a near-victory into a heartbreaking loss for a team that came in 3-2.
2. Match Overview Table
| Information | Match Details |
| Event | NFL Week 6 |
| Game | Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders |
| Date | October 13, 2025 |
| Venue | Northwest Stadium, Landover, MD |
| Attendance | 64,457 |
| Winner | Chicago Bears |
| Final Score | 25-24 |
| Broadcast | ABC (Monday Night Football) |
3. Core Match Statistics Overview
Any Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders match player stats recap has to start with the yardage and efficiency battle, because the box score numbers explain how a team can outgain its opponent by nearly 60 yards and still need a last-second kick to win.
| Team Stat | Washington Commanders | Chicago Bears |
| Total Yards | 329 | 386 |
| Passing Yards | 211 | 252 |
| Rushing Yards | 124 | 150 |
| Completions/Attempts | 19/26 (73.1%) | 17/29 (58.6%) |
| First Downs | 22 | 19 |
| Turnovers | 3 | 0 |
| Penalties (Yards) | 5 (40) | 9 (84) |
| Time of Possession | 31:34 | 28:26 |
| Sacks Allowed | 3 | 3 |
Turnover Battle
- Washington’s three giveaways — a Jayden Daniels interception, a Croskey-Merritt fumble, and the late botched handoff — erased its 26-yard total-yardage advantage over Chicago.
- The Bears defense didn’t need to dominate on paper to win the turnover battle; it just needed to be opportunistic in the fourth quarter, which is exactly what happened.
Third-Down and Field Position Efficiency
- Washington actually won time of possession by over three minutes and put up more first downs, evidence that the Commanders offense was rarely the problem.
- Chicago’s ability to finish drives — converting four of five field goal chances plus a touchdown drive — meant it needed fewer total yards to match Washington’s scoring.
Penalty Discipline
- Chicago was flagged nine times for 84 yards compared to Washington’s five for 40, self-inflicted damage the Bears mostly avoided paying for.
- Despite the penalty gap, Chicago’s defense and special teams made the plays that mattered most in the final minutes.
4. Period-by-Period Analysis
| Quarter | Chicago Bears | Washington Commanders |
| 1st | 6 | 0 |
| 2nd | 7 | 7 |
| 3rd | 3 | 10 |
| 4th | 9 | 7 |
- First quarter: Chicago controlled the opening frame behind two Jake Moody field goals (47 and 48 yards), while Washington’s offense stayed scoreless despite moving the ball.
- Second and third quarters: Washington found its footing, scoring on a Chris Moore touchdown catch before halftime, then adding a Matt Gay 53-yard field goal and a Luke McCaffrey 33-yard touchdown grab to take a 17-16 lead into the fourth.
- Fourth quarter: Washington extended the lead to 24-16 on a Zach Ertz score, but Chicago answered immediately with the D’Andre Swift 55-yard touchdown, then closed the game out on Washington’s late fumble and Moody’s walk-off field goal.
5. Detailed Team Player Statistics
Chicago Bears Player Statistics
Caleb Williams (QB): 17-of-29 for 252 yards, 1 passing touchdown, 0 interceptions, a 98.6 rating, and 3 rushing yards on 4 carries with a 1-yard rushing score. Williams struggled with accuracy for stretches (his completion rate sat under 60%) but delivered the biggest throw of the game — the 55-yard touchdown strike to Swift that kept Chicago’s comeback alive.
D’Andre Swift (RB): 14 carries for 108 yards, plus 2 catches for 67 yards and a touchdown — 175 yards from scrimmage in total. Swift was the engine of the Bears offense, breaking off chunk runs and then turning a short pass into the game’s signature play.
Luther Burden (WR): 4 catches on 4 targets for 51 yards, including a 37-yard grab, the longest reception by either team not tied to a touchdown. Burden gave Chicago a reliable chain-mover on early downs.
D.J. Moore (WR): 3 catches for 42 yards on 5 targets, adding 2 carries for 10 yards on jet-sweep-style touches. Moore’s numbers were modest, but he drew coverage away from Swift and Burden on key third downs.
Washington Commanders Player Statistics
Jayden Daniels (QB): 19-of-26 for 211 yards, 3 touchdown passes, 1 interception, a 119.2 rating, and 52 rushing yards on 10 carries. Daniels was efficient through the air for most of the night and spread the ball to four different receivers for touchdowns, but the turnover on the ground in the final minutes overshadowed an otherwise strong stat line.
Zach Ertz (TE): 6 catches on 6 targets for 43 yards and a touchdown — a perfect catch rate that made him Daniels’ most trusted target underneath. Ertz’s 6-yard score put Washington up 24-16 in the fourth quarter.
Jacory Croskey-Merritt (RB): 17 carries for 61 yards, adding a catch for 7 yards, but the game will be remembered for his lost fumble on the crucial late-game handoff. He was the clear early-down workhorse for Washington despite the costly mistake.
Luke McCaffrey (WR): Just 1 catch, but it went for 33 yards and a touchdown, a deep shot that gave Washington its first lead of the game late in the third quarter.
6. Statistical Leaders Summary Table
| Category | Chicago Bears | Washington Commanders |
| Leading Passer | Caleb Williams (252 yds, 1 TD) | Jayden Daniels (211 yds, 3 TD) |
| Leading Rusher | D’Andre Swift (108 yds) | Jacory Croskey-Merritt (61 yds) |
| Leading Receiver | D’Andre Swift (67 yds, 1 TD) | Zach Ertz (43 yds, 1 TD) |
| Most Receptions | Luther Burden / D.J. Moore (both had multi-catch games) | Zach Ertz (6 receptions) |
7. Analytical Breakdowns
Why the Bears Won
Opportunistic Defense in Crunch Time
Chicago didn’t turn the ball over once, and its defense forced three Washington miscues — the difference in a game where the Commanders otherwise out-gained the Bears’ first-down total.
| Metric | Chicago Bears | Washington Commanders |
| Turnovers Committed | 0 | 3 |
| Turnovers Forced | 3 | 0 |
Explosive-Play Passing Game
The Swift touchdown wasn’t a one-off; Chicago’s passing attack produced 14.8 yards per reception on the night compared to Washington’s 11.1, a sign the Bears were hunting chunk plays rather than settling for checkdowns.
Special Teams Reliability
Jake Moody made 4 of 5 field goal attempts, including the game-winner, giving Chicago a kicking specialist it could trust in a one-score finish just days after signing him off the practice squad.
Why the Commanders Lost
Turnovers at the Worst Possible Moments
Washington matched its five-game turnover total from earlier in the season in this single game, and the last one — a botched handoff between Daniels and Croskey-Merritt while trying to bleed clock — directly set up Chicago’s winning drive.
Missing Key Receiving Weapons
Washington played this game without Noah Brown and Terry McLaurin, two of Daniels’ top three targets from earlier in the season, forcing Chris Moore into a larger role than usual.
8. Historical Context & Advanced Insights
Season Series Breakdown
| Meeting | Result |
| Week 6, 2025 (Oct 13) | Chicago Bears win, 25-24 |
This was the season’s only scheduled meeting between the two clubs, with Chicago improving to 3-2 and Washington falling to 3-3 following the loss.
Advanced Statistical Insights
Daniels’ 119.2 passer rating dwarfed Williams’ 98.6, and Washington actually posted a better completion percentage (73.1% to 58.6%). Efficiency numbers alone suggested a Commanders win.
What tipped the scoreboard the other way was ball security: Chicago’s zero giveaways against Washington’s three meant the Bears effectively played with three or four extra possessions worth of field position and opportunity. In a one-score game, that margin mattered more than any per-play efficiency stat on either side.
9. Game Implications & Key Lessons
What This Means for the Bears
- A third straight win coming off their bye extended Chicago’s momentum under first-year coach Ben Johnson.
- Confidence in Jake Moody as a legitimate replacement kicker, delivered under maximum pressure in his first outing.
- Evidence that the offense can win via explosive plays even when Caleb Williams isn’t hitting a high completion percentage.
What This Means for the Commanders
- Ball security under pressure needs to improve immediately — three turnovers in one night erased a statistically stronger overall performance.
- Receiver depth is a real concern with both Noah Brown and Terry McLaurin sidelined.
- Washington’s pattern of alternating wins and losses through the season continued, a red flag for playoff consistency.
Key Lessons
- Total yardage doesn’t guarantee a win when turnovers pile up in the fourth quarter.
- A kicker’s confidence under pressure can single-handedly swing a close game.
- Explosive plays (Swift’s 55-yard score, McCaffrey’s 33-yard touchdown) often decide close football games more than steady, short-yardage drives.
- Depth at receiver matters — losing two top options limited Washington’s answers late.
- Clock-management execution on the ground is just as important as passing efficiency in the final minutes.
- A clean turnover margin is one of the most reliable predictors of who wins a one-score game.
FAQs
Who won the Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders game?
The Chicago Bears won 25-24 on a Jake Moody field goal as time expired.
Who had the best stats in the Bears vs Commanders game?
Jayden Daniels posted the highest passer rating (119.2) with 211 yards and 3 touchdowns, while D’Andre Swift led all players in yards from scrimmage with 175.
What were Caleb Williams’ stats in this game?
Williams finished 17-of-29 for 252 yards with 1 passing touchdown, 1 rushing touchdown, and no interceptions.
How many touchdowns did D’Andre Swift have?
Swift scored once, on a 55-yard touchdown reception from Caleb Williams in the fourth quarter.
Why did Washington lose despite outgaining stretches of the game?
Washington’s three turnovers, including a late fumble on a botched handoff, gave Chicago the extra possession it needed to win in the final minutes.
Where was the game played and what was the attendance?
The game was played at Northwest Stadium in Landover, Maryland, in front of 64,457 fans.
Conclusion
Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders match player stats from this Week 6 showdown prove that yardage and completion percentage only tell part of the story. Washington was efficient through the air and controlled the ball longer, but three turnovers — including one at the worst possible time — handed Chicago the field position and opportunities it needed.
Teamwork on the final drive, a clutch kick from a player signed days earlier, and a defense that capitalized on mistakes outweighed individual brilliance from Jayden Daniels on this particular night.






